The Daily Telegraph didn’t pull the Mark Patterson Interview fast enough, and thanks to Tyler Durden, we were able to read it. Stay tuned. – Ilene
Daily Telegraph Removes Mark Patterson Interview
Courtesy of Tyler Durden
It appears that the Daily Telegraph has gotten major cold feet about the incendiary interview (incendiary, at least, to the administration) it had posted last night with Mark Patterson. One can only speculate why that may be the case, but if you try to connect to the article that had received the biggest number of hits yesterday, you just get a big gaping 404 hole now.
Luckily, ZH expected some potential foul play, which is why we copied the entire piece in its entirety and still have it available for readers who would rather be exposed to the truth instead of watching CNBC and other increasingly more censored media outlets.
As Zero Hedge anticipates getting a take down notice from the DT any minute, I would love to get the feedback of any lawyer readers as to what recourse ZH would have in that case.
Update: Zero Hedge has heard from representatives for Mr. Patterson who insist that the Telegraph article was removed because it contains factual errors:
The posts are based on a factually incorrect article that appeared in the UK tabloid, The Telegraph.
We have contacted The Telegraph, which has removed the article from its own site due to the fact that it fabricated, misquoted, and misstated MatlinPatterson’s position.
Zero Hedge is happy to post any corrections that Mr. Patterson and his law firm would like to provide.
Update 2: This is a letter that Zero Hedge received from Mr. Patterson’s representatives unsolicited, which delineates MP’s views on why Evans-Pritchard’s article was "factually incorrect."
[click on letter for larger view]
Update 3: Erudite and established financial blogs Naked Capitalism and The Analytic are two additional places that Mr. Evans-Pritchard’s voice was captured and commented upon.
