Reminder: Sabrient is available to chat with Members, comments are found below each post.
Courtesy of Scott Martindale, Sabrient Systems and Gradient Analytics
Bulls are trying mightily to ensure the Santa rally holds into year-end and close the year in the positive, as all eyes remain on Europe. Although the European Central Bank (ECB) has refused to enact a U.S.-style “quantitative easing” by aggressively buying bonds to keep rates down, it has instead come through with an alternative solution—a bigger than expected refinancing operation in which it offers $645 billion in 3-year loans at 1% interest to struggling European banks. The hope is that the banks will reinvest in higher yielding bonds of the struggling euro-zone countries (i.e., “carry trade”). Such demand would keep rates on the sovereign debt manageable.
Observations:
1. Technology (IYW) has completed its rise back to the top of the heap, coming in with a robust Outlook score of 84. This is a 19-point increase from last week. After being held back by Oracle’s (ORCL) weak report last week, the group’s projected P/E looks relatively good, and analysts came out in support. Healthcare (IYH) stays strong with a 76 to hold second place by a comfortable margin over Industrial (IYJ), which has risen to third place.
2. Former leader Basic Materials (IYM) continues to fall in the rankings. It is held back by net downward revisions by the Wall Street community; although it still sports a low projected P/E. Apparently investors still think the analysts are too optimistic, even with the downward revisions.
3. As usual, Telecom (IYZ) is at the bottom. Stocks within IYZ are saddled with the highest projected P/Es. Utilities (IDU), the top performer for the year, has risen out of the bottom two. Consumer Services (IYC) is back in the bottom two. Stocks within this ETF have lost some support among analysts, and they are still dealing with tight margins and low return on sales.
4. Seeing IYW, IYE, IYF, and IYJ in the top half is a relatively bullish sign. It would be better to see IYM and IYC scoring above IYK. It’s also bullish to see the top Outlook score above 80. As a whole, the Outlook rankings for the 10 U.S. sector iShares reflect cautious optimism.
5. Looking at the Bull scores, IYE has been the leader on strong market days, scoring 60, followed by IYM and IYF. IDU remains the weakest with a 42. It is notable that IYW is not a leader on strong market days.
6. As for the Bear scores, IDU is the clear investor favorite “safe haven” on weak market days with a score of 65. IYH comes in second at 62. IWM displays the lowest Bear score of 42, which means that stocks with this ETF sell off the most on weak market days. IYF is close behind.
7. Overall, IYW now displays the best combination of Outlook/Bull/Bear scores. Adding up the three scores gives a total score of 186, although IYH is close behind at 183. IYC is the worst at 128. IYE has the best combination of Bull/Bear with a total score of 108, while IYM has the worst combination (101).
Top ranked stocks in Healthcare and Technology include United Therapeutics (UTHR), Neurocrine Biosciences (NBIX), Apple Inc. (AAPL), and Mistras Group (MG).
These scores represent the view that the Healthcare and Technology sectors may be relatively undervalued overall, while Consumer Services and Telecom sectors may be relatively overvalued, based on our 1-3 month forward look.
Disclosure: Author has no positions in stocks or ETFs mentioned.
About SectorCast: Rankings are based on Sabrient’s SectorCast model, which builds a composite profile of each equity ETF based on bottom-up scoring of the constituent stocks. The Outlook Score employs a fundamentals-based multi-factor approach considering forward valuation, earnings growth prospects, Wall Street analysts’ consensus revisions, accounting practices, and various return ratios. It has tested to be highly predictive for identifying the best (most undervalued) and worst (most overvalued) sectors, with a one-month forward look.
Bull Score and Bear Score are based on the price behavior of the underlying stocks on particularly strong and weak days during the prior 40 market days. They reflect investor sentiment toward the stocks (on a relative basis) as either aggressive plays or safe havens. So, a high Bull score indicates that stocks within the ETF have tended recently toward relative outperformance during particularly strong market periods, while a high Bear score indicates that stocks within the ETF have tended to hold up relatively well during particularly weak market periods.
Thus, ETFs with high Bull scores generally perform better when the market is hot, ETFs with high Bear scores generally perform better when the market is weak, and ETFs with high Outlook scores generally perform well over time in various market conditions.
Of course, each ETF has a unique set of constituent stocks, so the sectors represented will score differently depending upon which set of ETFs is used. For Sector Detector, I use ten iShares ETFs representing the major U.S. business sector.
About Trading Strategies: There are various ways to trade these rankings. First, you might run a sector rotation strategy in which you buy long the top 2-4 ETFs from SectorCast-ETF, rebalancing either on a fixed schedule (e.g., monthly or quarterly) or when the rankings change significantly. Another alternative is to enhance a position in the SPDR Trust exchange-traded fund (SPY) depending upon your market bias. If you are bullish on the broad market, you can go long the SPY and enhance it with additional long positions in the top-ranked sector ETFs. Conversely, if you are bearish and short (or buy puts on) the SPY, you could also consider shorting the two lowest-ranked sector ETFs to enhance your short bias.
However, if you prefer not to bet on market direction, you could try a market-neutral, long/short trade—that is, go long (or buy call options on) the top-ranked ETFs and short (or buy put options on) the lowest-ranked ETFs. And here’s a more aggressive strategy to consider: You might trade some of the highest and lowest ranked stocks from within those top and bottom-ranked ETFs, such as the ones I identify above.