10.4 C
New York
Tuesday, November 19, 2024

The Numbers Don’t Lie

Surprise, surprise! 

The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision has led to an explosion of campaign spending. 

Supreme Court Justices.

The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, Photograph by Tim Sloan/AFP/Getty Images.

The Numbers Don't Lie

If you aren’t sure Citizens United gave rise to the super PACs, just follow the money.

By , Slate

Excerpt:

Let’s focus only on presidential election years, to keep the comparisons as simple as possible. In the 1992 election season, when it was entirely possible (under that 1976 Supreme Court decision) for Sheldon Adelson or George Soros to spend unlimited sums independently on elections, total outside spending up to March 8 was about $1.5 million. In 2000, total outside spending up to March 8 was $2.6 million. In 2004 and 2008, with the explosion of 527 organizations, total spending to March 8 was $14 million and $37.5 million. What is the total for this election season through March 8? More than $88 million, a 234 percent increase over 2008 and a 628 percent increase over 2004. If this was not caused by Citizens United, we have a mighty big coincidence on our hands.

And, of course, this is only the total leading up to March 8, midway through the Republican primary. Wait until the super PACs and other organizations start raising their unlimited sums for the general election. Further, lots of groups are now using 501(c) organizations rather than super PACs for their campaign spending, in an effort to hide their donors. A Center for Responsive Politics study found that in 2010 the percentage of “spending coming from groups that did not disclose their donors rose from 1 percent to 47 percent since the 2006 midterm elections,” and “501(c) non-profit spending increased from 0 percent of total spending by outside groups in 2006 to 42 percent in 2010.” The same report found that 72 percent “of political advertising spending by outside groups in 2010 came from sources that were prohibited from spending money in 2006.”

With House and Senate seats also in play, and control of each chamber potentially up for grabs, we are likely to easily eclipse the total $301 million spent by outside groups in the entire 2008 election. How do I know?

Read the full article: The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision has led to an explosion of campaign spending. – Slate Magazine.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Stay Connected

156,479FansLike
396,312FollowersFollow
2,320SubscribersSubscribe

Latest Articles

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x