Our new section, "Members' Corner," is ready to host your thoughts, comments, and articles for discussion with your friends at PSW. All topics welcome. Please send your submissions to me at "ilenecapsw" at gmail. ~ Ilene
Courtesy of Nattering Naybob.
mkucstars – "Let's have a recount, oh yes please…."
In 2014, Wisconsin, Ohio and Kansas were highlighted as states where voting machine tampering was highly likely. In fact, this UK Royal Statistical Society report analyzing American voting machine manipulation, highlights the electronic voting systems used in the 2014 Wisconsin gubernatorial race and the 2016 Presidential race.
"These statistics show that patterns exist in the data that correlate the type of electronic voting system in use with the %R vote changing with the total votes cast.
Such patterns are examples of what we might expect to see if some voting systems were being sabotaged, but that doesn’t mean that no other explanations are possible for these patterns. Voting machine manipulation is, in my opinion, the most likely explanation for these patterns."
This ICIT analysis, Part 1 and Part 2, proves that hacking elections is easy because electronic voting systems are obsolete technology that is vulnerable to cyber, technical and physical attack.
This up to date list of voting equipment from the Wisconsin Elections Commission is a veritable who's who of offenders on the hacking list and in the voting machine manipulation report.
Above an excerpt from The Mezonic Agenda: Hacking the Presidency, a resource for problems with electronic voting systems, citing ESS iVotronic systems used extensively in Wisconsin. ESS is the largest voting machine company in the US.
Read that last paragraph well, as it proves the ESS system can be a black hole to the tune of over 100K votes in just a single county. Wisconsin with 100% of precincts reporting, Trump wins by 27K votes and what about Pennsylvania and other states which were close?
Considering Clinton won the popular vote, but was lacking in key precincts, in key states, where the above machines are extensively utilized, somebody in the Clinton campaign might want to have a closer look? More to come in I Voted?
